Back in March of last year, blogger Leisa Reichel coined the phrase "ambient intimacy" to describe the experience (and power) of such tools as Twitter, Flickr, and others. I like the phrase, and her explanation, a lot.
Leisa writes:
"Ambient intimacy is about being able to keep in touch with people
with a level of regularity and intimacy that you wouldn’t usually have
access to, because time and space conspire to make it impossible.
Flickr lets me see what friends are eating for lunch, how they’ve
redecorated their bedroom, their latest haircut. Twitter tells me when
they’re hungry, what technology is currently frustrating them, who
they’re having drinks with tonight.
Who cares? Who wants this level of detail? Isn’t this all just
annoying noise? There are certainly many people who think this, but
they tend to be not so noisy themselves. It seems to me that there are
lots of people for who being social is very much a ‘real life’ activity
and technology is about getting stuff done.
There are a lot of us, though, who find great value in this ongoing
noise. It helps us get to know people who would otherwise be just
acquaintances. It makes us feel closer to people we care for but in
whose lives we’re not able to participate as closely as we’d like.
Knowing these details creates intimacy. (It also saves a lot of time
when you finally do get to catchup with these people in real
life!) It’s not so much about meaning, it’s just about being in touch.
If you've yet to fully understand why these technologies have become so popular, read the full post (and comments) here.